Reciprocal System Research Society

https://i.postimg.cc/YS6s6HpZ/PHI.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/HxxGbkPL/calibration.jpg As indicated by the first graphic, Φ can be understood as comprised of three components: i. unit circle (typically 1+..., but π+ is recommended here, reasoning to follow) ii. subjected to √5 (ie. five equidistant ve...

************************ ************************ ADDENDUM: 04-16-2020 f(x)=x⁴+16x²-256 roots in 4/√Φ thus: ±√9.88854381999... ±i√25.88854381999... Number Axes.jpg Consider: 1 = UNITY √Φ = non-terminating, ≠1 Φ = PROGRESSION (irrational, non-terminating, constituency of '1' concerning UNITY). Φ² = D...

yin/kinematic/quantum π = 4 One electric displacement is 8 natural units and one magnetic displacement is 4 natural units (as magnetic:electric is 2:1) [(Φ 2 + Φ)][(1/Φ) 2 + (1/Φ)] = 1 + (1/Φ) + Φ + 1 2 + Φ + (1/Φ) = 4.236067977 (Φ 3 ) Also where Φ = +1 the result is 4 or π Checking work... phi of ...

But (1/Φ) 2 + 1/Φ ≠ 1, 4.23606797... must equal both simultaneously. Must be missing the "imaginary" root... missing the spin ("yin") component. Rotational (π) component is not considered, only linear ("yang"). Must use quantum π or yin π. yang/diagrammatic π = 3.14159...

What are the odds of a single polynomial whose +/- root solutions are +1 and +phi^3, thus scale invariant? Would that not be an equation which describes the physical universe? Φ 3 = Φ 2 + Φ = Φ 2 / (Φ-1) = (Φ+1) / (Φ-1) = -Φ 3 (1/Φ) 2 + 1/Φ = 1 But (1/Φ) 2 + 1/Φ ≠ 1, 4.23606797... must equal both s...

It might be of interest to you to review the attached file for my thoughts on the matter. Of note, it looks as though there is a mathematical corollary to the geometric concept of dimensional reduction/expansion with regard to phi Φ = (1 + √5)/2 Thanks, this is great: unfortunately I can not open o...

EDIT 2020/02/26 This thread culminated into the derivation of a more precise calculation of π as shown here: https://i.postimg.cc/rFShQqVn/Xpiphid.jpg Beginning with a circle whose diameter is √5, place two unit squares inside of the circle side-by-side (either horizontally or vertically, the latter...

No geometry = no orientation due no intrinsic direction (observer assumption required) Scalar is magnitude only and inherently lacks direction which differentiates from a vector (scalar + direction). Let us not forget ±i also are roots of 1. These are "imaginary" or more properly, rotatio...

@Doug Did you disengage ? Yes. Unfortunately, I'm dealing with some personal issues that are too distracting to permit me to engage in something as esoteric as this discussion. I just can't get up the energy to decipher the language being used, let alone the logic. I just want to say that, just as ...

Are you familiar with Chris Langan's work? It seems similar to your ideas, I found it pretty interesting. http://knowledgebase.ctmu.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Langan_CTMU_0929021-1.pdf Thank you for the resource - I wasn't aware of this work as I did not know who Chris Langan was. Nevertheless,...