Search found 191 matches

by dbundy
Fri Apr 10, 2020 10:22 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: How do impossible squares relate to RST
Replies: 40
Views: 20591

Re: How do impossible squares relate to RST

One of the important things to understand in dealing with the concepts of scalar motion is that it is scalar, meaning it's motion of magnitude only. Hence, rotational motion cannot be scalar, since it has direction. This includes bi-rotation, as iconoclastic as this might be. Since the days when the...
by dbundy
Fri Apr 10, 2020 9:41 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: How do impossible squares relate to RST
Replies: 40
Views: 20591

Re: How do impossible squares relate to RST

Wow. All this from the number four. It also turns out that the minimum number of units of motion from the combination of S and T units into the S|T unit is four: S|T = 1s/2t+1s/1t+2s/1t = 4s|4t, which can be shown to combine into all the fermions and bosons of the standard model, in three families, ...
by dbundy
Thu Apr 09, 2020 8:58 am
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Fundamental Physics - The Search for New Answers to Foundational Questions
Replies: 3
Views: 2676

Re: Fundamental Physics - The Search for New Answers to Foundational Questions

Ok, sounds good. I wasn't aware that it had progressed that far. Thanks for the info. Looking forward to learning more.
by dbundy
Wed Mar 25, 2020 8:13 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Fundamental Physics - The Search for New Answers to Foundational Questions
Replies: 3
Views: 2676

Fundamental Physics - The Search for New Answers to Foundational Questions

Note: In 2016, four years before he passed away, Bruce Peret had intended to write a book on his contribution to the development of a Reciprocal System theory (RSt), he called the RS2. However, he was never able to accomplish it. I aspire to the same lofty goal, but I know how difficult it is to wri...
by dbundy
Mon Feb 03, 2020 8:18 pm
Forum: Website General Information
Topic: Future of RS/RS2 research
Replies: 12
Views: 16254

Re: Future of RS/RS2 research

I visited Bruce last Sunday. He is in hospice and was sedated so heavily that we couldn't carry on a conversation. Unfortunately, he's failing fast. Prayers for him are appreciated, and well wishes on his behalf may be sent to Life Care Center of Salt Lake City, 1201 E 4500 S, Millcreek, UT 84117, R...
by dbundy
Wed Jan 15, 2020 9:59 am
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals
Replies: 29
Views: 22626

Re: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals

@Doug Did you disengage ? Yes. Unfortunately, I'm dealing with some personal issues that are too distracting to permit me to engage in something as esoteric as this discussion. I just can't get up the energy to decipher the language being used, let alone the logic. I just want to say that, just as ...
by dbundy
Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:11 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals
Replies: 29
Views: 22626

Re: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals

...but not your time ! The radius and circumference changes over the time of the observer, not of the observee. The observee cannot observe itself at a unit level. Well, it's hard to see what you're driving at. It's not as if any observation could be made, of course. However, we can conceive of a c...
by dbundy
Fri Nov 15, 2019 4:22 am
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals
Replies: 29
Views: 22626

Re: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals

Yeah, it's back to Mach's principle, and the argument with Newton's concept of absolute space. It's true that the inside observer cannot detect the rotation of a bucket without an external reference of some kind. However, this is not true with expansion/contraction motion, since the change is intern...
by dbundy
Mon Nov 11, 2019 2:15 pm
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals
Replies: 29
Views: 22626

Re: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals

No, I don't think I can, unless you are not making the distinction between vectorial direction and scalar "direction," where the latter would be interpreted as a 3d increase, decrease (8 units out, 8 units in; i.e. the oscillation in 2 3 = 8 "directions" of the space aspect)) over a 1d increase, inc...
by dbundy
Sat Nov 09, 2019 6:05 am
Forum: LRC Research
Topic: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals
Replies: 29
Views: 22626

Re: Discussions on Scalar Motion Fundamentals

Ok, I'm game. Let's do it. :)