Search found 83 matches

by davelook
Thu Sep 18, 2014 5:38 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Nasa validates 'impossible' space drive
Replies: 3
Views: 9710

I just found out about this

I just found out about this and I'm blown away. I really hope it's real. Seems too good to be true!

Hey Bruce, been awhile!
by davelook
Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:36 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Charge and Force of Attraction
Replies: 21
Views: 34826

I'll make this prediction:

I'll make this prediction: the strange quark will turn out to have a mass of around 70 MeV, instead of the current value of 101 MeV.
by davelook
Thu Jun 07, 2012 8:53 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Time (Miles Mathis)
Replies: 72
Views: 112419

Conditional vs Absolute

Motion/change is merely relative (with the exception of light) ---> Special Relativity

Acceleration/rate of change is absolute, including rotation (Sagnac effect) ---> General Relativity
by davelook
Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:18 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Charge and Force of Attraction
Replies: 21
Views: 34826

Latest Neutrino data makes diagram even more predictive!

Well, the latest neutrino data rules out anti-neutrinos having a different mass, so I deleted them from my java applet . This new data gives a "better" value for the mass 2 difference between tau-neutrinos and muon-neutrinos, 1st line below... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0903/daveloo...
by davelook
Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:14 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Charge and Force of Attraction
Replies: 21
Views: 34826

I still can't get tetrahedrons

I didn't use triangles to plot the quarks, I used the Rhombitrihexagonal tiling ... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0903/davelook/240px-Tiling_Semiregular_3-4-6-4_Sm.png The triangles are solely the result of trying to compute a "Volume per Nucleon". The most you can say is that the &quo...
by davelook
Wed May 30, 2012 12:34 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Charge and Force of Attraction
Replies: 21
Views: 34826

tetrahedrons?

How are you getting/seeing tetrahedrons out of an aligned stack of similar lattices?
by davelook
Thu May 24, 2012 8:49 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Charge and Force of Attraction
Replies: 21
Views: 34826

Quark placement

How did you determine the placement of up/down quarks within the proton/neutron triangles? The triangles are just a visual aid to how I calculated the "Volume per Nucleon". In the picture below, I've de-emphasized the triangles, and emphasized the lattice structure... http://img.photobuck...
by davelook
Mon May 21, 2012 11:34 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Time (Miles Mathis)
Replies: 72
Views: 112419

Pendulum

I also have a pendulum clock in the living room and could not help but notice that the pendulum requires MASS to operate, with two, opposing motions to keep it functioning: the force of the wound spring, and the acceleration of gravity. Take away either--don't wind it, or put it in orbit--and it st...
by davelook
Thu May 17, 2012 11:33 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Charge and Force of Attraction
Replies: 21
Views: 34826

Nuclear Radii - Part 3 (Volume per Nucleon - DATA)

Using the experimental data on nuclear radii from Table 1 of A consistent set of nuclear rms charge radii , I converted the radii to volume, and divided by the number of nucleons to plot the "Volume per Nucleon", compared to my theoretical 3.572.... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0903/d...
by davelook
Tue May 15, 2012 10:48 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Charge and Force of Attraction
Replies: 21
Views: 34826

Nuclear Radii - Part 2 (Volume per Nucleon)

Using the above referenced unit of space as the lattice spacing between quarks, we get a Volume Per Nucleon of 3.572 fm 3 ... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0903/davelook/VolPerNucleon.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/0903/davelook/index_jerry_loops.jpg BTW Bruce, love the new post creation ...