Search found 11 matches

by PJ_Finnegan
Mon Sep 26, 2016 7:29 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
Replies: 80
Views: 126789

Re: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System

There is no substitute for reading the originals. Subatomic particles are on page 145 . I could not do them justice as well as Dewy or Doug, anyway. Thanks. That raises another observation: since the particle types in the MS are finite and the combinations of the three motion values are infinite (2...
by PJ_Finnegan
Fri Sep 23, 2016 6:04 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
Replies: 80
Views: 126789

Re: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System

I've read Bruce Peret's tutorials but couldn't find answer to my questions. And I still haven't. Most relevant publications are in this library . Dewy Larson's materials were the first ones to be published. The prevailing opinion is that it is best to start with the " New Light on Space and Ti...
by PJ_Finnegan
Thu Sep 22, 2016 4:18 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
Replies: 80
Views: 126789

Re: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System

So RS is only an approximation valid for low speed, like Newtonian physics. And is more a "qualitative" theory than "quantitative" i.e. you couldn't fly a probe on Jupiter basing on RS only, which basically gives you an underlying theory about the nature of particles. For comput...
by PJ_Finnegan
Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:25 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
Replies: 80
Views: 126789

Re: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System

At speeds approaching the speed of the universal expansion, time and space have to be treated differently, as Einstein showed, but stationary or slow moving objects can be regarded as occupying locations defined by a 3d coordinate system, if we prefer, and for pedagogical reasons, I prefer. So RS i...
by PJ_Finnegan
Tue Sep 20, 2016 6:35 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
Replies: 80
Views: 126789

Re: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System

PJ_Finnegan wrote: So just to keep it simple, a point in the "motion" space (TU) with coordinates ( -1/2, 1/8, 3/4 } to what would correspond in the material sector (MS) or observed Universe? You don't understand. The scalar motion produces a physical entity, which consists of a 3D combin...
by PJ_Finnegan
Tue Sep 20, 2016 3:59 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
Replies: 80
Views: 126789

Re: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System

Now, whether or not the above development defines functions to project rationals into a R 4 codomain or not, I cannot say, but I can say that no one has ever confronted me with an argument of logical fallacy, regarding it. So just to keep it simple, a point in the "motion" space (TU) with...
by PJ_Finnegan
Thu Sep 15, 2016 1:54 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
Replies: 80
Views: 126789

I reckon the TU is made of 3

<t>I reckon the TU is made of 3 discrete directions of motions. Every direction can assume the values {1/N, N}, whose cardinality is 2N (non-zero natural numbers), i.e. 2N "points". This would be the domain of 4 mysterious functions projecting the 1st direction to a point in the 4D continuum, that i...
by PJ_Finnegan
Wed Sep 14, 2016 6:34 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
Replies: 80
Views: 126789

Re: Basic premises

<t>So given the lack of response I must assume there are no such formulas. I would be surprised of the contrary: I don't think it's matematically possible to find formulas projecting a discrete domain into a rational codomain.<br/> <br/> Too bad, I wanted to believe that Larson was really onto somet...
by PJ_Finnegan
Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:21 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
Replies: 80
Views: 126789

Re: Basic premises

(sorry but I don't know how to quote other posts, so I'll put them in bold+italic ) I'm confused by your use of "point." To get a location, you need a projective plane to establish a coordinate system (or in a 3D+T system, a "projective volume"). The TU has no such assumption. Al...
by PJ_Finnegan
Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:04 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Dimensions in the Reciprocal System
Replies: 80
Views: 126789

Basic premises

@Bruce I've tried to follow the discussion above, but being a newbie I seem to lack the basic premises, so bear with me. My understanding so far is that we can start from two spaces: the "conventional" universe we perceive with our senses and instruments (what RS calls the "material s...